12 Aug 2022
WA-24M-2-03/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Citation
- WA-24M-2-03/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-24M-2-03/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The court held that, absent clear evidence that each director had actual knowledge of the mandatory order, it would not be just to dispense with personal service under Order 45 r.7(7); service on the company’s solicitors does not suffice for personal service on directors without written authority; the court has no jurisdiction in these proceedings to pre-emptively dispense with personal service of future committal cause papers under Order 52, which must be decided in those future proceedings on their own facts.