23 Oct 2024
1. ) TAN KA KEN 2. ) TAN KAR ENG CHAN FOR HENG
- Citation
- CB-22NCvC-6-05/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- CB-22NCvC-6-05/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The 07.06.2016 agreement was valid and binding; defendant's plea of non est factum failed because the agreement was prepared by solicitors and explanations were given and the defendant did not prove lack of consent or that he took all reasonable precautions; although there were delays in payment, the loan was ultimately paid in full by 17.09.2021 so there was no continuing default permitting plaintiffs to exercise the contractual option; therefore plaintiffs' claim to purchase defendant's 1/4 share was dismissed; defendant's counterclaim for partition under s142 and for release/redemption of…