2 Dec 2024
Sunitha Madhu [Membawa Tindakan Ini Sebagai Pentadbir Sah Harta Pusaka Simati (Madhu A/l K.v. Dharan (No. K/p: 550403-10-6085)] 1. ) PALAYAM A/L NAGAPPAN 2. ) Tersaim Lall A/l Sadhu Ram [Yang Beramal Sebagai Peguambela Dan Peguamcara Di Tet
- Citation
- BA-22NCvC-114-03/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- BA-22NCvC-114-03/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court found on balance of probabilities the PA was forged; 1st Defendant used forged PA to transfer title to Kannan; 2nd Defendant (solicitor) actively participated and was negligent or willfully blind; Kannan’s title was therefore defeasible under s.340(2)(b); 3rd Defendant failed to prove it was a purchaser in good faith for valuable consideration under proviso to s.340(3); 4th Defendant breached statutory duty in registering transfers; consequently registration in name of 3rd Defendant is set aside and plaintiff as administrator is declared proprietor.