29 Jul 2024
CHIN WEE SHENG
- Citation
- MC-83-405-08/2023 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Case number
- MC-83-405-08/2023 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Evidence P13 (and dependent expert report P10 and PW3 evidence) was inadmissible because it was created at the instruction of the raiding officer and the photocopy was unclear; its prejudicial effect outweighed probative value; P14–P21 were found to be punters' slips; prosecution failed to establish the presumption under s.11(1)(c) CGHA and thus failed to make out a prima facie case — accused acquitted and discharged at end of prosecution's case.