2 Feb 2021
1. ) FIRST COMMERCE SDN BHD 2. ) TITAN VISTA SDN BHD 1. ) TITAN VISTA SDN BHD 2. ) FIRST COMMERCE SDN BHD
- Citation
- WA-24C-100-06/2020 & WA-24C-137-06/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-24C-100-06/2020 & WA-24C-137-06/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The adjudicator acted within jurisdiction and did not deny natural justice: he considered the submissions, validly found the conditional payment clause void under s.35 CIPAA, applied an appropriate payment term (derived from PAM 2006 as reflected in submissions) and fixed interest accrual dates under his powers; therefore the s.15 setting aside application failed and the adjudication decision is enforceable under s.28 CIPAA.