23 Oct 2025
Syarikat Sen Joo Heng Sdn Bhd Pua Ching Kiau
- Citation
- BA-16-47-09/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- BA-16-47-09/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court accepted DGM's factual finding that the respondent was terminated by the appellant via Mr Low but found DGM erred in law by disregarding that the respondent was 62 and had reached the statutory minimum retirement age; applying the Minimum Retirement Age Act, relevant regulation and authority in Colgate Palmolive, the respondent is not entitled to termination benefits, therefore the DGM's award was set aside.