5 Oct 2022
Samat Bin Yamin
- Citation
- 07-8-06/2022(B) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
- Court
- B
- Case number
- 07-8-06/2022(B) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
Section 13(2) of SOSMA is constitutionally valid: the gender/age/infirmity classification is an intelligible differentia with a rational nexus to SOSMA's objective of preventing threats to public order and is proportionate; sections 26A and 26D ATIPSOM properly constitute security offences within SOSMA; Federal Court had jurisdiction to hear the bail application; therefore the applicant's Notice of Motion for bail was dismissed.