25 Jan 2021
1. OAG ENGINEERING SDN BHD 2. OAG OFFSHORE PIPELINE SERVICES SDN BHD 3. OAG INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE SERVICES LTD - ABU DHABI 4. OAG INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE SERVICES LTD 5. SETIA OFFSHORE SERVICES SDN BHD 1. NG HOE KEONG 2. DEVANDRAN A/L ARUMU
- Citation
- WA-22IP-42-07/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-22IP-42-07/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The court held that it lawfully exercised its inherent jurisdiction under Order 92 r.4 ROC and related statutory provisions to grant the Protective Order and the Anton Piller provisions after finding the plaintiffs met the ex parte disclosure threshold and required safeguards; the defendants' challenges to compel prior service and to rely on Bar Council Ruling 14.09 or certain Rules to avoid undertakings failed; accordingly Enclosures 15 and 26 were dismissed and Enclosure 41 was only partially allowed/dismissed to the extent described, with costs in the cause for the dismissed applications.