12 Dec 2025
AFP LAND LIMITED SUPER LINE (M) SDN BHD
- Citation
- JA-22NCC-76-07/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- JA-22NCC-76-07/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The JID was regularly obtained: service on the corporate defendant was valid under Order 62 rule 4 and the Interpretation Acts, any writ defects were technical and non-prejudicial, the limitation defence failed because time ran from the 1.7.2025 demand and the action was timely, there was documentary evidence of the Defendant's liability so no arguable defence was shown, and the stay application was academic and lacking special circumstances especially given the Defendant's failure to comply with the conditional RM400,000 deposit; both applications are dismissed with costs.