Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

Topic

Signature verification

Legal area

Court

16 Aug 2024

Ng Chui Kin Ng Chin Kum (Sebagai Wasi Harta Pusaka Ng Chin Hon @ Ng Chin Woon

Citation

WA-24NCvC-1630-05/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-24NCvC-1630-05/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The application was dismissed because the plaintiff admitted the signatures, the minor variations were reasonably explained by differences in time and the plaintiff's age/physical deterioration, the application was filed late and would prejudice process, and the court has power under s73 EA to compare writings without requiring a forensic examination; therefore no valid reason existed to order forensic testing.
11 Jun 2024

1. ) THILAKAVATHY A/P KASINATHER dan T.THURAI RATHNAM A/L A.THAMBIPILLAI sebagai pemegang Geran Probet Harta Pusaka Viknes A/L Thambipillai 2. ) T.THURAI RATHNAM A/L A. THAMBIPILLAI 3. ) ARUL DEVAH A/L SUPERAMANIAM sebagai pemegang Surat Ku

Citation

BB-A52-63-10/2023 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Court

Sessions Court
Case number

BB-A52-63-10/2023 (Mahkamah Sesyen)

Because defendants pleaded the existence of the Lease Agreement TA2016 and the authenticity of that document is contested by plaintiffs as fraudulent, it was reasonable and necessary at the interlocutory stage to order the defendants to produce the original lease for expert examination (Jabatan Kimia or an agreed alternative) within seven days to determine authenticity; refusal or claim that the deceased took the original does not defeat an order for production where possession is pleaded and relevance is established; costs ordered in the cause.
29 Jul 2020

HO ENG HENG R VIGNESWARAN A/L RAJU (mengamal di bawah nama dan gaya The Chambers of Waran)

Citation

BA-22NCVC-505-08/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

BA-22NCVC-505-08/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

Dismissal: further forensic examination was unnecessary under Order 24 r12/13 because definitive forensic testing had already concluded signatures were authentic, the application was dilatory and an afterthought, the dispute is fundamentally a fee dispute to be resolved at trial, and repeated testing would waste time and delay trial; accordingly the application (Enclosure 97) was dismissed with costs.

Malaysia Case Law

Ng Chui Kin Ng Chin Kum (Sebagai Wasi Harta Pusaka Ng Chin Hon @ Ng Chin Woon

1. ) THILAKAVATHY A/P KASINATHER dan T.THURAI RATHNAM A/L A.THAMBIPILLAI sebagai pemegang Geran Probet Harta Pusaka Viknes A/L Thambipillai 2. ) T.THURAI RATHNAM A/L A. THAMBIPILLAI 3. ) ARUL DEVAH A/L SUPERAMANIAM sebagai pemegang Surat Ku

HO ENG HENG R VIGNESWARAN A/L RAJU (mengamal di bawah nama dan gaya The Chambers of Waran)