3 Nov 2022
HIN MAJU SDN BHD K.S. CHIN MINERALS SDN BHD
- Citation
- WA-12BNCC-9-03/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-12BNCC-9-03/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The appeal was dismissed because the alleged oral ancillary agreement was inadmissible under ss.91 and 92 Evidence Act 1950 (it would add to and contradict the SPA), it was pleaded to have been made prior to the SPA (so s.92(d) for subsequent agreement did not apply), the Defendant failed to discharge the burden of proof and the trial judge's factual findings were not plainly wrong or insufficiently reasoned to justify appellate intervention.