8 Jan 2020
1. ) QUI JIERU 2. ) PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 1. ) PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. ) QUI JIERU
- Citation
- B-05(SH)-33-01/2019 & B-05(H)-620-12/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Court
- SH
- Case number
- B-05(SH)-33-01/2019 & B-05(H)-620-12/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Court affirmed conviction because appellant was willfully blind and failed to rebut statutory presumption of possession under s.37(d); her purported Alcontara notice lacked sufficient particulars and did not trigger investigative obligations; trial judge did not apply double presumptions; s.39B(2A)(d) was not satisfied so life sentence was inappropriate and substituted with death penalty.