Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

Topic

Striking out under o18 r19 roc 2012

Legal area

Court

27 May 2022

ISMAIL BIN OTHMAN 1. ) DUTA SKYLINE SDN. BHD. 2. ) AMAZING SYMPHONY SDN BHD

Citation

BA-24NCC-122-08/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

BA-24NCC-122-08/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The Share Sale Agreement (clause 11.2) vested the plaintiff with a contractual protective right over the land such that the 1st Defendant could not create encumbrances without the plaintiff's prior written consent; the JVA and attendant power of attorney were executed without that consent and without required shareholder approvals under s.223 Companies Act 2016, rendering the JVA void and unenforceable; the plaintiff therefore had standing to seek declaratory and injunctive relief and the interlocutory injunction should be maintained; striking out was inappropriate as the claim was not plainl…
25 Mar 2021

AZIO E-PAY SERVICE MALAYSIA SDN BHD [ No.Syarikat: 700558-K ] 1. ) NORIMAH BINTI THAMRIN [ No.K/P : 810511016018 ] 2. ) NOOR AZLAN BIN ABD GHAFAR [ No.K/P : 810701146243 ]

Citation

JA-A72NCC-1123-10/2020 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Court

Magistrates' Court
Case number

JA-A72NCC-1123-10/2020 (Mahkamah Majistret)

The claim was statute-barred: plaintiff failed to plead or prove an acknowledgement within s.26(2) Limitation Act 1953 and failed to meet the formal requirements of s.27; plaintiff also failed to demonstrate it held a moneylender licence as required by the Moneylenders Act 1951; accordingly the writ and statement of claim disclosed no sustainable cause of action and were struck out under O18 r19 ROC 2012 with costs.
15 Nov 2018

1. TRANSNASIONAL EXPRESS SDN BHD 2. PLUSLINER SDN BHD 3. SYARIKAT KENDERAAN MELAYU KELANTAN BERHAD 4. SYARIKAT REMBAU TAMPIN SDN BHD 5. KENDERAAN LANGKASUKA SDN BHD 6. KONSORTIUM TRANSNASIONAL BERHAD 7. MHSB PROPERTIES SDN BHD TAN CHONG IND

Citation

W-02(IM)(NCVC)-92-01/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Court

IM
Case number

W-02(IM)(NCVC)-92-01/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)

The Court held the pleadings raised triable issues of coercion and unjust enrichment and established sufficient interest (locus standi) for all seven Plaintiffs; the claim was not a plain and obvious case warranting summary striking out under O18 r19 ROC 2012; High Court striking out order was therefore set aside and the Plaintiffs were entitled to have their allegations ventilated at trial.

Malaysia Case Law

ISMAIL BIN OTHMAN 1. ) DUTA SKYLINE SDN. BHD. 2. ) AMAZING SYMPHONY SDN BHD

AZIO E-PAY SERVICE MALAYSIA SDN BHD [ No.Syarikat: 700558-K ] 1. ) NORIMAH BINTI THAMRIN [ No.K/P : 810511016018 ] 2. ) NOOR AZLAN BIN ABD GHAFAR [ No.K/P : 810701146243 ]

1. TRANSNASIONAL EXPRESS SDN BHD 2. PLUSLINER SDN BHD 3. SYARIKAT KENDERAAN MELAYU KELANTAN BERHAD 4. SYARIKAT REMBAU TAMPIN SDN BHD 5. KENDERAAN LANGKASUKA SDN BHD 6. KONSORTIUM TRANSNASIONAL BERHAD 7. MHSB PROPERTIES SDN BHD TAN CHONG IND