Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

Topic

Temporary occupation licence

Legal area

Court

14 Nov 2024

NG LU YI KS AQUACULTURE SDN. BHD.

Citation

BL-22NCvC-14-04/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

BL-22NCvC-14-04/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

Paragraph 4 of the Statement of Claim sufficiently pleads a claim of trespass for the purposes of pleading; the Defendant's application for further and better particulars was a fishing expedition brought belatedly and should be refused; details of the extent and nature of the alleged trespass can be established at full trial by evidence and documents; application dismissed with costs RM3,000.
5 Dec 2023

Astana Setia & Euro Saga Sdn Bhd 1. ) Pritam Singh A/L Harchand 2. ) Kamal Bin Che Soh 3. ) Mohd Rusydi Bin Jamaluddin 4. ) Jamaluddin Bin Ngah Zainon 5. ) Ahmad Daniel Bin Jamaluddin 6. ) Muhammad Idris Bin Mohd Nor 7. ) Iskandar Affizzul

Citation

WA-24NCvC-898-03/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-24NCvC-898-03/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The Plaintiff being the registered proprietor held indefeasible title and had not given licence or consent; the temporary occupation licence relied upon had expired and did not confer ongoing rights; the Defendants failed to demonstrate any triable issue or valid licence/consent; therefore the matter was properly disposed of summarily under Order 89 RoC and the Plaintiff was entitled to possession and the reliefs ordered.
17 Mar 2022

TEE YAM HOLDINGS SDN BHD 1. ) CHONG KWOK SOON 2. ) YAP FUNG @ YIP SOW KAU 3. ) LIEW BEEN SEIN 4. ) YIP MOW WAH 5. ) CHEONG WEI SAU 6. ) CHAI LAM SAN 7. ) KOH KON MIN 8. ) KOH KAH KAM 9. ) CHONG WEI LIK 10. ) HO YOON MIN 11. ) WONG MAN LOONG

Citation

AA-24NCvC-373-12/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

AA-24NCvC-373-12/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

Plaintiff being the registered proprietor proved title and intention to regain possession; defendants failed to adduce credible documentary evidence of any licence, permission or state acquiescence and thus failed to show any triable issue; the Order 89 summary procedure was appropriate and the plaintiff's application was allowed.

Malaysia Case Law

NG LU YI KS AQUACULTURE SDN. BHD.

Astana Setia & Euro Saga Sdn Bhd 1. ) Pritam Singh A/L Harchand 2. ) Kamal Bin Che Soh 3. ) Mohd Rusydi Bin Jamaluddin 4. ) Jamaluddin Bin Ngah Zainon 5. ) Ahmad Daniel Bin Jamaluddin 6. ) Muhammad Idris Bin Mohd Nor 7. ) Iskandar Affizzul

TEE YAM HOLDINGS SDN BHD 1. ) CHONG KWOK SOON 2. ) YAP FUNG @ YIP SOW KAU 3. ) LIEW BEEN SEIN 4. ) YIP MOW WAH 5. ) CHEONG WEI SAU 6. ) CHAI LAM SAN 7. ) KOH KON MIN 8. ) KOH KAH KAM 9. ) CHONG WEI LIK 10. ) HO YOON MIN 11. ) WONG MAN LOONG