Amupanda v Minister of Agriculture, Water and Land Reform and Others (HC-MD-CIV-ACT-OTH-2021/02075)
Amupanda v Minister of Agriculture, Water and Land Reform and Others (HC-MD-CIV-ACT-OTH-2021/02075) [2023] NAHCMD 547 (5 September 2023)
The plaintiff satisfied the first two requirements for a protective costs order (public importance and public interest), but failed to fully disclose his financial position as required by rule 20(1)(c). Without proper financial disclosure, the court cannot determine if it is fair and just to grant the order or impose conditions. Leave is granted to supplement papers for proper assessment.
Source excerpt
- Protective costs orders
- Public interest litigation
- Rule 20
- Costs in civil litigation