Sign in
Namibia Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Namibia Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Namibia decisions

Source-linked decisions currently available to browse

Criminal law [2022] NAHCMD 229

S v Naobeb (CR 35 of 2022)

S v Naobeb (CR 35 of 2022) [2022] NAHCMD 229 (10 May 2022)

On automatic review, the High Court confirmed convictions and sentences but remitted the matter for compliance with section 10(7) of the Arms and Ammunition Act.

  • Automatic review
  • Firearms offences
  • Sentencing
  • Procedural compliance
  • Criminal-law
  • Automatic-review
Read case analysis
Constitutional law [2022] NAHCMD 233

Chika and Others v Commissioner General Raphael Amunyela: Namibia Correctional Facility and Others (HC-MD-CIV-MOT-GEN 51 of 2020)

Chika and Others v Commissioner General Raphael Amunyela: Namibia Correctional Facility and Others (HC-MD-CIV-MOT-GEN 51 of 2020) [2022] NAHCMD 233 (10 May 2022)

The Correctional Service Act 9 of 2012 applies to the applicants as it was in force at the time of sentencing. Section 114(1) is not unconstitutional as it does not amount to unfair or unjust discrimination and does not impose a harsher penalty than that applicable at the time of the offence. The applicants are not entitled to parole consideration under the repealed statutes, and the application of section 114(1) is not retrospective in a manner that violates the Constitution.

  • Parole eligibility
  • Retrospective application of law
  • Discrimination
  • Equality before the law
  • Sentencing
  • Interpretation of statutes
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2022] NAHCMD 228

Gregory v Minister of Safety and Security (HC-MD-CIV-ACT-OTH- 1397 of 2021)

Gregory v Minister of Safety and Security (HC-MD-CIV-ACT-OTH- 1397 of 2021) [2022] NAHCMD 228 (9 May 2022)

The plaintiff's claim is prescribed because the first action did not interrupt prescription due to lack of statutory notice, and the present action was instituted outside the statutory period prescribed by s 133(3) of the Correctional Service Act. The conduct complained of was in pursuance of the Act, and the plaintiff bound himself to its provisions.

  • Prescription
  • Statutory notice requirements
  • Prisoner claims
  • Civil liability of the state
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2022] NAHCMD 227

Majiedt v S (HC-MD-CRI-APP-CAL 33 of 2019)

Majiedt v S (HC-MD-CRI-APP-CAL 33 of 2019) [2022] NAHCMD 227 (6 May 2022)

The High Court upheld an appeal against robbery conviction and sentence, finding the magistrate misdirected herself on intention and that the appellant’s version was not disproved.

  • Robbery with aggravating circumstances
  • Appeal against conviction
  • Appeal against sentence
  • Non-pathological criminal incapacity
  • Incomplete record of proceedings
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2022] NAHCMD 226

Mbambi v Minister of Home Affairs, Safety and Immigration (HC-MD-CIV-ACT-DEL- 3830 of 2021)

Mbambi v Minister of Home Affairs, Safety and Immigration (HC-MD-CIV-ACT-DEL- 3830 of 2021) [2022] NAHCMD 226 (6 May 2022)

The particulars of claim are excipiable not for failing to disclose a cause of action, but for failing to state the nature of the guardianship exercised by the person assisting the minor, rendering the pleading vague and embarrassing. The relationship or capacity of the alleged guardian must be disclosed to establish locus standi and to prevent abuse, especially in light of child protection concerns.

  • Exception to pleadings
  • Locus standi of minors
  • Guardianship
  • Vague and embarrassing pleadings
Read case analysis
Contract law [2022] NAHCMD 225

Delport v Alweendo (HC-MD-CIV-ACT-OTH- 3810 of 2019)

Delport v Alweendo (HC-MD-CIV-ACT-OTH- 3810 of 2019) [2022] NAHCMD 225 (6 May 2022)

The High Court dismissed a claim for dissolution of an alleged partnership, finding no valid consensus on partnership terms and that a key document was induced by misrepresentation.

  • Partnership
  • Misrepresentation
  • Oral agreement
  • Tacit agreement
  • Dissolution of partnership
  • Oral-agreement
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2022] NAHCNLD 49

S v Uwukhaeb (CR 24 of 2022)

S v Uwukhaeb (CR 24 of 2022) [2022] NAHCNLD 49 (29 April 2022)

High Court review of a 16-year-old’s conviction and sentence for housebreaking and theft. Conviction confirmed, but sentence set aside for fresh sentencing with a pre-sentence report.

  • Housebreaking with intent to steal and theft
  • Rights of child offenders
  • Fair trial
  • Role of guardian in criminal proceedings
  • Pre-sentence reports
  • Juvenile-justice
Read case analysis
Insolvency law [2022] NAHCMD 222

Ohorongo Cement (Pty) Ltd v Erasmus (HC-MD-CIV-MOT-GEN 257 of 2021)

Ohorongo Cement (Pty) Ltd v Erasmus (HC-MD-CIV-MOT-GEN 257 of 2021) [2022] NAHCMD 222 (29 April 2022)

The High Court ordered attorney-and-client costs against the respondent for dishonest opposition in a sequestration matter, and declined referral to the Prosecutor General.

  • Sequestration
  • Costs
  • Withdrawal of opposition
  • Attorney and client costs
  • Party and party costs
  • Costs-order
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2022] NAHCNLD 48

S v Ndawedwa (CR 23 of 2022)

S v Ndawedwa (CR 23 of 2022) [2022] NAHCNLD 48 (28 April 2022)

On automatic review, the High Court confirmed the main convictions but corrected an incompetent contempt sentence to match the statutory maximum.

  • Contempt of court
  • Sentencing
  • Review of magistrate's decision
  • Contempt-of-court
  • Criminal-review
  • Magistrates-court-act
Read case analysis
Admiralty law [2022] NASC 14

Prime Paradise v Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB and Others (SA 86 of 2021; SA 92 of 2021)

Prime Paradise v Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB and Others (SA 86 of 2021; SA 92 of 2021) [2022] NASC 14 (26 April 2022)

The Supreme Court held that the High Court correctly exercised its wide discretion under Rule 138 to order the sale of the vessel pendente lite, as the registered owner supported the sale, the mortgagee's claim was undisputed, and Prime's opposition was based on inadmissible hearsay and unsupported allegations of fraud. The court further held that ACT Maritime LLC had standing under the loan agreement and mortgage. The order for security for preservation costs was interlocutory and, without leave to appeal, the appeal was struck from the roll.

  • Judicial sale of vessel
  • Security for preservation costs
  • Standing to sue
  • Hearsay evidence
  • Interlocutory appeals
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Namibia decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.