Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Namibia decisions
Decisions matching the current search
S v Mukuve (CRIMINAL 46 of 2021) [2021] NAHCMD 257 (27 May 2021)
High Court review setting aside convictions for culpable homicide and failure to render assistance, because the trial court relied on inadmissible hearsay and weak circumstantial evidence.
Enkali v Kahuure and Others (3099 of 2015) [2019] NAHCMD 264 (31 July 2019)
The plaintiff failed to prove entitlement to eviction on a balance of probabilities. The first defendant's version of lawful purchase and occupation was credible, corroborated by independent evidence, and consistent with probabilities. The sale agreement was valid and exempt from stamp duty. The plaintiff's objections were procedurally improper and lacked merit. The defendant is entitled to transfer of the property.
Source excerpt
Conrad v Dohrmann and Another (2073 of 2015) [2018] NAHCMD 121 (14 May 2018)
The High Court held a mixed sale agreement was divisible and that the defendants repudiated the furniture and inventory portion, entitling the plaintiff to recover N$400,000.
Beukes and Another v First National Bank Limited and Others (HC-MD-CIV-MOT-GEN 235 of 2017) [2018] NAHCMD 94 (13 April 2018)
The High Court dismissed an application to set aside a sale in execution, holding that the applicants’ valuation certificate was inadmissible and Rule 110(9) was not proved breached.
S v Nango (CA 171 of 2003) [2005] NAHC 10 (8 June 2005)
High Court appeal on rape conviction and sentence. The court upheld a child witness identification as reliable and increased the sentence to 15 years.
No. 1 Estates CC v Baard (1206 of 2002) [2002] NAHC 5 (3 September 2002)
The plaintiff failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that its introduction of the purchaser to the property was the effective cause of the sale. The sale resulted from a new and unrelated chain of events initiated by the defendant, and the plaintiff's involvement was not a consistent, uninterrupted, and major positive force leading to the sale.
Source excerpt
Sprangers v FGI Namibia Ltd (578 of 2000) [2002] NAHC 1 (29 January 2002)
High Court of Namibia insurance claim case on theft, onus of proof, and a policy duty to prevent loss; plaintiff succeeded for the agreed indemnity.
Nakanyala v Old Mutual Namibia Limited ((P)I 578/2000) ([P] I 578 of 2000) [2002] NAHC 7 (29 January 2002)
Namibian High Court insurance case on theft cover, burden of proof, and whether the insured breached a duty to prevent loss.
Explore more
