Binga v S (CA 96 of 2014)
Binga v S (CA 96 of 2014) [2015] NAHCMD 180 (8 May 2015)
The conviction was based on corroborated evidence from the complainant and another witness, not solely on a single witness. Missing portions of the record did not materially affect the court's ability to consider the merits. The appellant's version was highly improbable, and the magistrate was correct in accepting the State's evidence and rejecting the defence.
Source excerpt
- Corruption
- Evidence
- Appeal procedure
- Single witness rule