Esheria Namibia Case Law
Sign in
Namibia Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Namibia Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Search and filter Namibia case law

Results update automatically as you type.

Namibia decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure [2019] NAHCMD 540

Christian v Namibian Financial Institutions Supervisory Authority and Another (2232 of 2007)

Christian v Namibian Financial Institutions Supervisory Authority and Another (2232 of 2007) [2019] NAHCMD 540 (9 December 2019)

Court
High Court Main Division
Case number
2232 of 2007

The High Court held that NAMFISA remained a party and ordered it to file a rule-compliant notice of intention to defend, with further steps set for service and case management.

  • Notice of intention to defend
  • Service of summons
  • Case management
  • Default judgment
  • Civil-procedure
  • Notice-of-intention-to-defend
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2014] NAHCMD 340

Hanstein v Hanstein (483 of 2014)

Hanstein v Hanstein (483 of 2014) [2014] NAHCMD 340 (7 November 2014)

Court
High Court Main Division
Case number
483 of 2014

The High Court set aside a restitution of conjugal rights order because the defendant’s notice of intention to defend was irregular, not void.

  • Rescission of judgment
  • Notice of intention to defend
  • Divorce
  • Restitution of conjugal rights
  • Condonation of late filing
  • Rescission-of-judgment
Read case analysis
Date unavailable
Civil procedure [2020] NAHCMD 303

Christian v Namibia Financial Institutions Supervisory Authority and Another

Christian v Namibia Financial Institutions Supervisory Authority and Another [2020] NAHCMD 303 (2 June 2020)

Court
High Court Main Division

The plaintiff failed to establish any irregularity or prejudice regarding the first defendant’s notice of intention to defend, the return in terms of rule 6, or the authority of the first defendant’s legal practitioners. Any procedural irregularity was cured by subsequent compliance, and no condonation was required. The application was therefore dismissed with costs.

Source excerpt

  • Irregular proceedings
  • Notice of intention to defend
  • Authority to act
  • Condonation
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Date unavailable
Civil procedure [2020] NAHCMD 303

Ndalusha v S

Ndalusha v S [2020] NAHCMD 303 (21 July 2020)

Court
High Court Main Division

The plaintiff failed to establish any irregularity or prejudice regarding the first defendant’s notice of intention to defend, the return in terms of rule 6, or the authority of the first defendant’s legal practitioners. Any procedural irregularity was cured, and the plaintiff’s application was without merit and dismissed with costs.

Source excerpt

  • Irregular proceedings
  • Notice of intention to defend
  • Authority of legal practitioners
  • Condonation for late filing
  • Costs
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Namibia decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.