S v Amalovu and Another (CA 39 of 2003)
S v Amalovu and Another (CA 39 of 2003) [2005] NAHC 19 (28 June 2005)
The High Court confirmed two theft convictions but set aside the others and held that later convictions were not “previous convictions” for mandatory sentencing.
- Theft of motor vehicles
- Sentencing
- Interpretation of 'previous convictions'
- Mandatory minimum sentences
- Motor-vehicle-theft
- Criminal-sentencing