Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Namibia decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Queta v S [2020] NAHCMD 328 (3 August 2020)
Bail appeal dismissed. The High Court held the magistrate was not wrong to treat the appellant as a flight risk and to prefer the investigating officer’s evidence.
Barnard v S (2) (CC 5 of 2013) [2018] NAHCMD 399 (6 December 2018)
The applicant failed to show on a balance of probabilities that his admission to bail would not frustrate the due administration of justice or public interest, given the seriousness of the offence, risk of abscondment, and the need to maintain public confidence in the administration of justice. The interests of justice require that the applicant prosecutes the appeal while in custody.
Source excerpt
Matali v S (17 of 2016) [2017] NAHCMD 295 (17 October 2017)
The High Court of Namibia dismissed a renewed bail application on new facts, holding that the alleged fresh evidence did not outweigh the seriousness of the charges and flight risk.
S v Miguel and Others (CA 11 of 2016) [2016] NAHCMD 175 (20 June 2016)
Appeal against refusal of bail dismissed. The High Court found the appellants failed to show they were not a flight risk and the irregularity was not fundamental.
S v Kumar Stanis (CC 28 of 2009) [2011] NAHC 223 (26 July 2011)
The applicant is a foreign national with no substantial ties to Namibia, faces serious charges, and is a flight risk. The interests of justice and the public would not be served by granting bail. Application for bail is refused.
Source excerpt
Explore more
