25 Jun 2007
ATTORNEY GENERAL AND ANOR V BODY CORPORATE NO. 68792 AND ANOR HC WN CIV: 2006-485-1341
- Citation
- openlaw-e26b3ea8_a229_4259_a057_1f70256eefdd.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Plaintiffs were entitled to costs because the second defendant's conduct in refusing votes, while acting as chairman and having an interest as a unit owner, caused the proceeding; indemnity costs were not justified; however a reduction from full recoverable costs was warranted because the judgment clarified issues of general importance, and a contribution of $12,000 was a reasonable award.