26 May 2011
SOLICITOR-GENERAL V KEEFE HC NAP CIV 2009-441-000608
- Citation
- openlaw-1717d576_4532_479f_b161_71e28a85aa4a.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Court held that (a) the house was used predominately for commercial cannabis cultivation and was therefore tainted; (b) the Crown proved on the balance of probabilities that at least half of the cash and bank balances were proceeds of Ms Keefe's sales based on evidence of her active role (deliveries and door sales) and forensic apportionment, and (c) forfeiture of Ms Keefe's remaining interest in the house and half the cash and bank monies was not grossly disproportionate because likely proceeds from the operation substantially exceeded the value of the forfeited interests, so a forfeiture or…