9 Feb 2016
RUBICK v R [2016] NZCA 8
- Citation
- [2016] NZCA 8
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Court granted an extension of time but declined leave to adduce further evidence because the material was not fresh, credible or cogent and would not have altered the sentencing assessment; the High Court was entitled to impose preventive detention because expert reports showed enduring deviant sexual interests, manipulative behaviour, increased seriousness and persistence of offending including past age 60, so age did not reliably mitigate future risk.