5 Oct 2023
DUNSTAN v THE LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER [2023] NZHC 2791
- Citation
- [2023] NZHC 2791
- Court
- High Court
The pleadings did not disclose any reasonably arguable cause of action appropriate for determination by judicial review; they sought to enforce criminal and tort remedies and to substitute merits-based decisions rather than challenge the legality of a public decision-maker's exercise of power, and therefore the proceedings were struck out under r 15.1(1)(a) High Court Rules.