5 Oct 2023
The application was struck out because it sought to relitigate issues already finally determined on appeal and did not comply with the High Court Rules; accordingly it constituted an abuse of process and the duty Judge was entitled to strike it out under r5.35B.
14 Jul 2020
The application to recall the sealed judgment was dismissed because none of the exceptional grounds for recalling a sealed judgment existed, the alleged statutory points had been drawn to and considered by the Court and by the Courts of Appeal and Supreme Court on appeal, and there was no basis to reopen a sealed and appealed judgment; accordingly the original reasoning that the Commissioner lawfully assessed ongoing daily care stands.
27 Apr 2018
The interim injunctions were discharged because the substantive proceeding was conclusively determined against the plaintiffs and no serious issue remained to be tried; the court allowed a short delayed effect to permit reconciliation efforts, and ordered that the plaintiffs be examined as to their means on a fixed future date to facilitate enforcement of unpaid costs, with costs awarded to defendants on a Category 2B basis.