15 Nov 1999
Lovelace v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
- Citation
- [1999] NZACC 322
- Court
- District Court
The appeal is dismissed because the review officer was correctly found not to be precluded under s.90(2) as he had not been involved in the original decision, and the review was commenced within the statute period so s.90(9) did not bar the review; delays to obtain consent for medical reports constituted an extension of the original review but did not affect timely commencement.