12 Jul 2023
PRESTIGE BUILDING REMOVALS LTD v VOGEL [2023] NZHC 1815
- Citation
- [2023] NZHC 1815
- Court
- High Court
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the proposed appeal did not raise a question of law capable of bona fide and serious argument nor one of sufficient importance to justify further appeal; the arbitrator's finding that the Vogels provided "proper access" was not perverse and was supported by the evidence, so there was no need to determine the statutory point about the 2007 amendment.