17 Jan 2020
McKenzie v Mortimer [2020] NZHC 17
- Citation
- [2020] NZHC 17
- Court
- High Court
On a prima facie review the court held the plaintiffs' claims (both the alleged unconsented alterations and the nuisance claims) were arguably within the scope of the broad arbitration clause (clause 18); clause 9 and clause 20 are separate tracks and clause 20 was not shown to be engaged so the clause 18 exception did not apply; consequently the proceeding was stayed and the disputes referred to arbitration under clause 18, with leave reserved to lift the stay if arbitration is unreasonably delayed.