2 Dec 2004
FAY V CHIRNSIDE & RATTRAY PROPERTIES LTD SC SC CIV 7/2004
- Citation
- openlaw-57721775_9203_43da_9256_d6485898f102.pdf
- Court
- Supreme Court
Leave to appeal was refused because s13(4) imposes an additional threshold requiring that it be necessary in the interests of justice to hear the appeal before the proceeding concludes, that threshold was not met, the remittal sought was an ordinary exercise of appellate discretion not warranting extraordinary intervention, and there was no issue of public importance or substantial risk of miscarriage of justice.