16 Feb 2018
The claim was struck out because any cause of action vested in the Official Assignee on the plaintiff's adjudication in bankruptcy and remained with the Assignee until the Assignee is released under s408 of the Insolvency Act 2006; the plaintiff therefore lacked standing, and additionally the statement of claim was unintelligible, prolix and disclosed no tenable cause of action causing prejudice and delay.
6 Oct 2015
The Court struck out the plaintiffs' claim based on Mr Goldman’s personal one-share KVL option because the rights attaching to that share vested in the Official Assignee on bankruptcy and therefore the plaintiff lacked capacity to pursue that claim; however the Court refused to strike out the separate claims relating to VCI's unexercised option and the claims against the executors and widow because those claims raised arguable temporal connection and notice facts, were not plainly statute-barred, and could not be disposed of summarily; the Court ordered modest security for costs be paid ($20,…