11 Nov 2011
TAYLOR V ATTORNEY-GENERAL HC AK CIV 2010-404-6985
- Citation
- openlaw-8dad3f35_8762_4fc9_a52b_f04091770ca8.pdf
- Court
- High Court
1993 Segregation Claims were struck out as time-barred because the excessive delay (over 16 years) prejudiced the defendant's ability to mount a defence and no satisfactory excuse was given; 1998 Segregation Claims must be repleaded to clarify that plaintiff was not formally on BMR but alleges BMR-type conditions and require particulars before further strike out of s9 can be considered; Current Conditions Claims must delete s9 reliance and require statutory particulars for any breach of statutory duty; fiduciary claim re P119 purchases is struck out because no fiduciary relationship exists; p…