17 Dec 2007
MATAI LIMITED V ZENECA INVESTMENTS LIMITED HC AK CIV 2006-404-2809
- Citation
- openlaw-d7a4e11e_8fe1_4f08_b2fa_3a755110ea78.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Zeneca was entitled to costs on a 2B basis because it successfully defeated Maitai's pleaded causes of action, but the Court exercised its discretion to halve the award because approximately half the hearing time was spent on the defendants' unsuccessful and partly irrelevant claims; costs were not ordered to the non-party funder.