23 Nov 2010
GIBSON V ATTORNEY GENERAL AND ORS HC WN CIV-2010-485-479
- Citation
- openlaw-7b063365_afed_4c7b_8db2_dccc9dfbaabc.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The amended statement of claim was struck out (except as to the discrete claim against the fourth defendant) because it was excessively long, repetitive, unclear and lacking in required particulars, advanced untenable causes of action in part, and amounted to an abuse of process/vexatious litigation; plaintiff given leave to file a further amended claim limited to the fourth defendant within 30 days.