13 Jun 2011
SIMES V LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY HC HAM CIV 2010-419-000006
- Citation
- openlaw-7c081a93_2424_4a36_97ad_92ad90984ded.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The Court found both Panels failed to take into account a material and relevant consideration—the Agency-commissioned audit report—and the Review Panel breached natural justice by relying on unspecified comparator cancellation decisions without disclosing them or allowing the plaintiff to respond; those defects required remittal to the Review Panel for reconsideration. Other challenges (interpretation of s24 LC Act and Part 13, legitimate expectation, most natural justice complaints, and unreasonableness) were dismissed on the facts or law, including that statutory cancellation under the Lega…