1 Dec 2015
DALLISON V VAN DYK [2015] NZCA 580
- Citation
- (2015) 30 FRNZ 427
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Court declined leave to adduce further evidence because the proposed evidence was not fresh, could and should have been presented earlier, and was not cogent enough to affect the result; the Court declined leave to appeal because the issues advanced were essentially factual (valuation and assessment of expert evidence), did not raise questions of law of sufficient general importance, and concurrent findings in the lower courts and the need for finality weighed against a further appeal.