25 Mar 2010
B V K CA585/2009
- Citation
- openlaw-062c4ed9_ca04_4d82_bd7b_2476a0329cc3.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Court of Appeal allowed the father's appeal, quashed the High Court's orders authorising relocation and restored continuation of the Family Court shared parenting arrangements because, on an evaluative s 5 analysis, continuity and maintenance of meaningful relationships with both parents (especially the father's ongoing close relationship and daily involvement) outweighed the benefits of relocation; parental conflict did not justify relocation where shared arrangements were working and there was no safety risk under s5(e).