11 Sept 2015
POLICE v DIXON [2015] NZHC 2200
- Citation
- [2015] NZHC 2200
- Court
- High Court
On the evidence—affidavits from investigators and the respondent's admission in a video interview—the cash of $49,900 was tainted and the respondent had unlawfully benefited from significant criminal activity, therefore the grounds for the forfeiture orders were established and the draft orders were made.