29 Oct 2021
GRIGGS AND CHAMBERLAIN ON BEHALF OF NGĀI TŪMAPŪHIA-Ā-RANGI HAPŪ v THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2021] NZHC 2913
- Citation
- [2021] NZHC 2913
- Court
- High Court
The interlocutory injunction was dismissed because plaintiffs failed to establish a serious question to be tried on the Crown claim (entry into the Deed does not itself extinguish legal rights pending legislation), and the asserted procedural defect in beneficiary approval was at best arguable and technical with substantive compliance; on balance of convenience and overall justice preventing a long-negotiated settlement was unjustified. Leave to appeal was granted.