20 Nov 2019
SYLVIA PARK RESTHOME LIMITED v ZHANG [2019] NZHC 3030
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 3030
- Court
- High Court
The freezing orders were extended because Sylvia Park established a good arguable case, there were identifiable assets, and there was a real risk of dissipation evidenced by the withdrawal and the respondent's purchase of a one‑way ticket; on balance the interests of justice require continuation until determination or agreement.