10 Feb 2011
MINISTRY OF JUSTICE FOR THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA V TOP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED HC AK CIV-2010-404-2918
- Citation
- openlaw-3e57359a_f160_4708_9737_23c231b94295.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Interveners, having succeeded in their interlocutory application for a stay, are prima facie entitled to costs; special reasons did not exist to reserve costs despite serious unproven allegations. However costs were reduced because part of the application relied on s 165 of the Companies Act which failed; accordingly costs are fixed in favour of the interveners at $7,708 with disbursements $692.82 (total $8,400.82).