20 Mar 2013
FAVA V OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE HC AK CIV-2011-404-4669
- Citation
- openlaw-f7cb0f2c_e984_4d92_92f1_45465dd1d5c5.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The court refused to rescind the prior security for costs order, found the applicant had a reasonable opportunity to comply, that non‑compliance was intentional and in contumelious disregard of court orders, and that continuation would cause substantial prejudice to Aral; applying the tests in Prager-Macholl and Jagwar the court exercised its discretion to strike out the proceeding and awarded costs to Aral on a 2B basis.