21 Dec 2010
SHANDIL V SHANDIL HC AK CIV-2009-404-008105
- Citation
- openlaw-7ea316fd_0ce1_40d9_8740_36bd27182e9c.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The judge corrected the arithmetical error under r 11.10, maintained the view that the appellant is entitled to costs on a 2B basis and awarded $7,080 to the appellant; the respondent was awarded costs for the interlocutory application on a 2B scale reduced by 50% (total $1,200) following Priestley J's recommendation; parties must themselves determine any set-off between awards.