20 Oct 2020
SIEMER v ATTORNEY-GENERAL [on application for recall] [2020] NZHC 2756
- Citation
- [2020] NZHC 2756
- Court
- High Court
The apparent error was a clerical transposition of a statute section reference which is correctable under High Court Rules r11.10 and does not meet the limited grounds for recall set out in Horowhenua County; the post‑hearing alteration merely clarified that a High Court Judge cannot review another High Court Judge's decision and was not a material change, therefore the application for recall is denied and the judgment will be corrected and reissued under r11.10.