22 Jun 2022
CHINAPPA v NARAIN [2022] NZCA 259
- Citation
- [2022] NZCA 259
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Court allowed correction of the clerical date error under r 8 but refused to alter the substantive award of a 20% beneficial interest to the first respondent because that interest equates to her direct 20% financial contribution; the appellants, having funded the remaining 80% by borrowing, remain solely responsible for repayment of those borrowings and the 20% award does not absolve responsibility for apportioning sale costs, which would be addressed at sale or by the High Court.