13 Apr 2010
ARTHUR WILLIAM TAYLOR V THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS HC AK CIV-2009-404-7339
- Citation
- openlaw-37a4272e_34ec_4aad_89c9_8c408b5aee44.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The Court refused to make immediate appointments because the applicant had not shown requisite particularity, there was no evidence the named or proposed experts were willing or able to assist, no reliable cost information or proof of impecuniosity, and the roles of amicus or court expert are non‑partisan and ill suited to supply the partisan evidence the applicant sought; the applications were therefore adjourned part‑heard with directions that proposed experts provide résumés and fee estimates within 28 days and the parties consider appointing counsel for the child (with associated legal ai…