7 Jul 2011
RONALD KEVIN WILLIAMS V THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL HC ROT CIV 2010-463-000634
- Citation
- openlaw-a5aae3a0_5afd_454e_897d_b08245790c1e.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The claim was struck out because the pleaded case disclosed no reasonably arguable cause of action: the alleged losses were time-barred by the Limitation Act 1950, the bailiff's actions were within execution of judicial process and entitled to s 6(5) Crown immunity, the Te Turi Whenua Act did not apply to unsecured chattels, and the pleadings were confusing and hopeless such that further amendment would be futile.