29 Sept 2003
THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL (ON BEHALF OF THE DEPARTMENT FOR COURTS) V KATINA LYNDA TIPENE CA CA115/03
- Citation
- openlaw-d3700e9c_2a8f_4a80_9c92_9cd02dd29a7a.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Leave to appeal was refused because the Employment Court's decision rested on construction of the individual employment contract (that only the Judge could terminate the Associate) which is not the type of question for which s214 leave is granted here; the Chief Judge's tentative remarks on Crown prerogative were not part of the ratio and lacked the general or public importance required for a s214 appeal.