12 Aug 2021
WRIGHT v ATTORNEY-GENERAL as representative of the NEW ZEALAND POLICE [2021] NZHC 2101
- Citation
- [2021] NZHC 2101
- Court
- High Court
Costs on the two interlocutory applications were fixed and awarded to the defendants because the plaintiff failed on those applications, there was no special reason to defer or reduce costs despite BORA context, and a 50% uplift was warranted on the second application because it was duplicative and entirely without merit thereby unnecessarily increasing costs.