29 Jul 2016
DOAK & OR v ROLLANDER & ORS [2016] NZHC 1741
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 1741
- Court
- High Court
The court held the second plaintiff's proposed use is not a 'commercial use' within clause 7 when that term is given its ordinary meaning informed by context; clause 7 should be read by ordinary meaning first and the District Plan only engaged if the use is established as commercial; incidental office/administration does not render the overall use commercial; declaratory relief granted to the plaintiffs.